Skip to main content

Why the Nexus 7 succeeded where others failed

The Nexus 7 is the most popular pure Android tablet. Did it get there simply by way of its low price or is there a more complex explanation?





The Nexus 7 is the most popular pure Android tablet available. How do I know? Well, data compiled by Handset Detective and a bit of clever maths by analyst Ben Evans are certainly strong indicators. But also, everyone and their mothers seem to have one. Especially in the U.S., but other markets have also been strong supporters.
I'd even say that the Nexus 7 deserves a decidedly corpulent chunk of credit for giving the overall Android tablet market a boost. Yes, Amazon found success with the first version of theKindle Fire, but the lack of expected tablet features (no camera, no volume button) and an intentionally closed-off OS left those looking to do something more than watch movies, TV shows, or read books, unsatisfied.
So why has the Nexus 7 (deftly built by Asus) found so much success where other Androidtablets (remember the $400, 7-inch Springboard? Neither do most) seemingly haven't? Short answer: it's nearly a perfect combination of power, design, and features at a relatively low price and as such is the first tablet to really get the whole high-quality/low price tablet thing right. The long answer is a bit more complicated than that, so let's dive right in.

It's fast (enough)

The Nexus 7 houses the Tegra 3 system-on-chip, which includes a quad-core CPU and a 12-core GPU. That's enough horsepower to smoothly run the latest Android games while rendering 1,024,000 pixels (1,280x800 resolution). It's a fast chip by tablet standards, but even at the tablet's launch, it wasn't the fastest. Also, while apps load fast, they don't load super-fast. Just fast enough that it doesn't test the patience of most users.
So while it may not win any benchmark contests, it also won't leave you staring impatiently at your screen for long periods of time, twiddling your thumbs while you wait for a large app to load.
No, it's not console quality, but the Nexus 7's performance is nothing to shake a phased plasma rifle at.
(Credit: Eric Franklin/CNET)
Lesson learned: The Nexus 7 was never the most powerful tablet -- the third generation iPadhad it beat at launch, as did the Transformer Prime --, but it didn't have to be. It simply utilized high-quality components (in this case: a pretty powerful CPU/GPU combo, fast RAM, and an optimized OS), resulting in apps that opened quickly, games that ran smoothly, and Webpages that downloaded with all due haste. If a tablet can manage that, most users will walk away with a positive impression and will likely tell their friends when the time comes.

Its screen is densely packed

With pixels that is. Screen quality is one of those things difficult to appreciate before experiencing an actual quality screen. And by "quality screen", I simply refer to one that delivers sharp images and wide viewing angles, so no matter which angle you view the screen from, you can still clearly see its contents. The Nexus 7 features a 1,280x800 resolution, equalling 216 pixels-per-inch (ppi). The In-Plane Switching (IPS) panel delivers the wide viewing angles.
The Nexus 7 makes for one of the best reading experiences you can have this side of a dedicated e-reader.
(Credit: Eric Franklin/CNET)
Recently some 7-inch tablets (like the HP Slate 7 and Asus Memo Pad ME172V) have cropped up looking to get a piece of the Nexus 7's success. But while these upstarts feature lower prices, they make the mistake of not taking screen quality as seriously. The ostensible thought being that a cheaper screen will cut down on costs, making for a more appealing overall package. At least from a price perspective.
However the vast majority of your interactions with a tablet are conducted through its screen. So you look at it. A lot. And while your eyes may eventually adapt to the lower resolution, as more apps get released that take advantage of high resolutions you may eventually find yourself pining for something sharper.
Of course, resolution won't be as important to everyone, but I'm willing to bet that those that are tech savvy enough to even know what a Nexus 7 is, will also appreciate its screen clarity. With the advent of HDTV, Blu-ray, and computer monitors and laptop screens that feature a minimum resolution of 1,280x720, we're quickly getting to a point where jagged images stand out to us. Even if rough text on a tablet screen doesn't necessarily bother us, today we're much more likely to notice it than just a few years ago.
The Nexus 7's screen was demonstrably better than most other 7-inch tablets at the time of release and that was enough to be impressive at launch. It's certainly not as impressive now, but again, like its performance, it was good enough to deliver smooth text and images. Which is essentially what users want from their screens.

It rolls with the latest version of Android, always

The Nexus 7 shipped with Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean) and was continually updated whenever a new version of the OS was released. 4.1 marked a vast improvement over the previous version of the OS with smoother performance, more accurate typing, a Siri-like voice assistant, andGoogle Now.
The tablet's release also coincided with the addition of movies, TV shows, and magazines to Google Play. Not to mention an app store that was growing in both quality and quantity.
Compared with Android 4.0, Jelly Bean's home screen felt much more focused, with iOS-like app arrangement, while retaining the customizations Android has always been known for.
Android 4.2's settings shortcut menu is one of those small, but effective additions.
(Credit: Eric Franklin/CNET)
For a good while the Nexus 7 was the only place you could access these exclusive Android features. And the trend has only continued. Google tablets (including the Nexus 10) still serve as guinea pigs for the latest version of Android, sometimes including new features and performance improvements months before another tablet catches up. That's powerful, useful support you don't get on non-Google Android tablets.

It's extremely comfy

Google and Asus got the Nexus 7's design right. Not perfect (I still feel the bezel's too narrow), but right. It's no-frills, light, and (thanks to that glorious leather backside) comfortable. There are no jagged edges and no additions that could make using it more complicated for novice users.
Ahhh, So comfy.
(Credit: Eric Franklin/CNET)
There's really not that much more to say about its design and its that inherent simplicity that makes it work. Nexus 7's designers knew what was important to include and what wasn't and applied that knowledge to appeal to the widest audience possible. It's not that ports are a bad idea; both MicroSD and HDMI can be incredibly useful on a tablet. However, rather than stuffing the Nexus 7 with too many physical bells and whistles, the designers went for an overall aesthetic and practical elegance that few tablets have come close to topping.

Priced to move

And move it has, if the numbers above are to be believed. Yep, the single most important reason that the Nexus 7 succeeded was its low price, but that price doesn't work unless the rest of its components are sound.
It's $200 for what was at the time the most powerful 7-inch tablet available, but there were a number of other factors. Chief among them was that the market was primed and ready. Before the Nexus 7, I found it difficult to strongly recommend a 7-inch tablet. They weren't bad, just not exceptional and were usually overpriced.
A whole year after the Nexus 7's release however and there's no hesitation. When I'm asked what the best small tablet is, the answer flows from my lips with ease.
Other 7-inchers included more physical features, but at the end of the day, it didn't matter that the Nexus 7 didn't have a back camera, that it had no microSD or HDMI ports, or that you couldn't use the front camera for anything other than video chat. The bottom line was that you were getting a capable tablet with a high-res screen and a kick-ass version of Android you couldn't find on any other tablet. All for only $200.

Success in a nutshell and the next Nexus

Of the five reasons I've given above, price is the one I've isolated as the main argument for the Nexus 7's success. However, and I want to make this point crystal clear: slapping a low price on just any old thing and expecting consumers to gobble it up will only lead to disappointment. And there are plenty of cheap, but terrible tablets that can attest to this.
Consumers are becoming more savvy by the day and there needs to be a minimum level of quality met by each device. The Nexus 7 raised the quality bar and a year later, few tablets have been able to reach it. And next week we could see the bar raised to even more dizzying heights.
Rumors point to Google I/O (May 15-17) as the stage where the next version of the Nexus 7 will debut. While no one outside of Google knows or are officially allowed to say anything about its next 7-inch tablet, it's highly likely the company won't deviate too far from its previous success formula. That is, release a powerful, comfortable tablet with a feature-rich easy-to-use OS and a robust app ecosystem for a relatively low price.
If Google can do that -- and by "do that", I mean "do that" by 2013 standards -- we should all be in for something worthwhile.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best tech gifts under $100 for Dad

Roku's speedy streamer is the best box yetThe good:The Roku 3's excellent new interface and faster processor makes it feel quicker and more responsive than any other streaming box. More than 750 channels are supported, including Netflix, Amazon Instant, HBO Go, Hulu Plus, Pandora, MLB.TV, Amazon Cloud Player, and Vudu. It also has cross-platform search that scours several major TV and movie services to find content. And Roku's nifty new remote has a built-in headphone jack that lets you listen without disturbing others. The bad:There's still no official YouTube channel. Some services have an outdated interface on Roku compared to other streamers. The Apple TV still works better within the Apple ecosystem. And the Roku 3 isn't a great option if you're mostly looking to stream your personal digital media collection. The bottom line:The Roku 3 is the best streaming-video box yet, with tons of content sources, lightning-fast performance, and an innovative remote wit…

'Star Trek II' producer talks Ceti Eel, J.J. Abrams, and more (Q&A)

Robert Sallin, producer of "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan," shares his experience working on the film, looks at the future of "Trek," and dishes on whether that was Ricardo Montalban's real chest.

The release of "Star Trek Into Darkness" has not only spurred interest in the "Trek" world in general, but especially in its film daddy, the original Khan-as-villain movie "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan." While the new film takes quite a few detours, it is full of homages to the earlier work. Let's look back to 1982. "Star Trek: The Motion Picture" had been released in 1979 and faced a poor critical reception. Paramount, the film's studio, was gun-shy after the movie nearly doubled its original budget, ending up with a $46 million price tag. Nonetheless, plans for a second movie plodded along. It's 30, 40 years later and we have new audiences. You can't keep dwelling on the old guys and the old things. It has…

Power-packed plasma shines brighter

The good:The Samsung PNF8500 series exhibits outstanding picture quality with a class-leading bright-room image, exceedingly deep black levels, very good shadow detail, highly accurate colors and superb off-angle and uniformity characteristics; mind-boggling feature list with touch-pad remote, IR blaster with cable box control, four pairs of 3D glasses, motion and voice command, and the industry's most capable Smart TV platform; unique styling with full-width ribbon stand and slim-bezel metallic finish. The bad:Extremely expensive; correct film cadence requires sacrificing some black level; remote lacks numerous direct commands; imperfect cable box control; consumes more power than LCD TVs. The bottom line:Samsung's best-performing TV ever, the PNF8500 series pushes the plasma picture quality envelope, especially in bright rooms.Amid the hubbub aboutPanasonic's financial troubleand questions about how it will affectthe future of plasma TV, it's easy to forget about Samsu…