Skip to main content

iPhone users found to spend more time on their handsets

iPhone users average more time on their handsets but spend less time using it for talking than their Android counterparts, according to new research.



iPhone users in the U.S. average more time on their smartphones than Android users, but they spend less time talking on their handsets than their open-source counterparts, according to a new study released Tuesday.
Overall, the average American adult spends nearly an hour a day on their smartphones, but just a quarter of that time is spent talking, according to Experian Marketing Services research. The findings illustrate the increasing shift of consumer tastes to mobile devices for their information and entertainment.
Voice calling was the most popular single smartphone activity among U.S. users, comprising 26 percent of smartphone usage, or about 15 minutes a day. Texting came in a close second with 20 percent of activity, or nearly 12 minutes, followed by social networking and Web surfing with 16 percent and 14 percent, respectively.
American's spent almost the same time e-mailing as they did playing games, constituting 9 percent and 8 percent of average smartphone usage. Use of the device's camera and GPS functionality made up some of the least-used features on smartphones, according to the research.
The findings indicated very different usage patterns depending on the mobile platform. Users of Apple's iPhone spent an average of 1 hour 15 minutes on their devices, while Android users logged an average of 49 minutes on theirs. However, Android users spent 28 percent of that time talking compared with the 22 percent iPhone users averaged -- the same amount of time they spent texting.

Texting, social networking, and Web browsing were neck-and-neck for the second most popular activity among Android users, with an average of 16 percent each -- the same percentage for iPhone users' average social networking time. Web browsing on the iPhone encompassed 12 percent of average daily use, according to Experian.
"Smartphone users may constantly debate which operating system is supreme, but we see clear differences between the ways consumers use their phone depending on the operating system that runs it," John Fetto, senior marketing manager for Experian's consumer insights group, said in a statement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best tech gifts under $100 for Dad

Roku's speedy streamer is the best box yetThe good:The Roku 3's excellent new interface and faster processor makes it feel quicker and more responsive than any other streaming box. More than 750 channels are supported, including Netflix, Amazon Instant, HBO Go, Hulu Plus, Pandora, MLB.TV, Amazon Cloud Player, and Vudu. It also has cross-platform search that scours several major TV and movie services to find content. And Roku's nifty new remote has a built-in headphone jack that lets you listen without disturbing others. The bad:There's still no official YouTube channel. Some services have an outdated interface on Roku compared to other streamers. The Apple TV still works better within the Apple ecosystem. And the Roku 3 isn't a great option if you're mostly looking to stream your personal digital media collection. The bottom line:The Roku 3 is the best streaming-video box yet, with tons of content sources, lightning-fast performance, and an innovative remote wit…

'Star Trek II' producer talks Ceti Eel, J.J. Abrams, and more (Q&A)

Robert Sallin, producer of "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan," shares his experience working on the film, looks at the future of "Trek," and dishes on whether that was Ricardo Montalban's real chest.

The release of "Star Trek Into Darkness" has not only spurred interest in the "Trek" world in general, but especially in its film daddy, the original Khan-as-villain movie "Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan." While the new film takes quite a few detours, it is full of homages to the earlier work. Let's look back to 1982. "Star Trek: The Motion Picture" had been released in 1979 and faced a poor critical reception. Paramount, the film's studio, was gun-shy after the movie nearly doubled its original budget, ending up with a $46 million price tag. Nonetheless, plans for a second movie plodded along. It's 30, 40 years later and we have new audiences. You can't keep dwelling on the old guys and the old things. It has…

Power-packed plasma shines brighter

The good:The Samsung PNF8500 series exhibits outstanding picture quality with a class-leading bright-room image, exceedingly deep black levels, very good shadow detail, highly accurate colors and superb off-angle and uniformity characteristics; mind-boggling feature list with touch-pad remote, IR blaster with cable box control, four pairs of 3D glasses, motion and voice command, and the industry's most capable Smart TV platform; unique styling with full-width ribbon stand and slim-bezel metallic finish. The bad:Extremely expensive; correct film cadence requires sacrificing some black level; remote lacks numerous direct commands; imperfect cable box control; consumes more power than LCD TVs. The bottom line:Samsung's best-performing TV ever, the PNF8500 series pushes the plasma picture quality envelope, especially in bright rooms.Amid the hubbub aboutPanasonic's financial troubleand questions about how it will affectthe future of plasma TV, it's easy to forget about Samsu…